If the logos end up looking good, some people might not believe you when you say it's a render. These do look really, really good.
Just out of curiosity, are the imperfections (slight speckle) a consequence of the lighting model, or added texture to prevent the surfaces from looking too perfect?
Also, IMHO the depth of field effect in the one picture ruins it. It's very obviously computer-generated (at very low quality, to boot), while the other images do a very good job of looking real.
Just out of curiosity, are the imperfections (slight speckle) a consequence of the lighting model, or added texture to prevent the surfaces from looking too perfect?
Also, IMHO the depth of field effect in the one picture ruins it. It's very obviously computer-generated (at very low quality, to boot), while the other images do a very good job of looking real.