Request on part 6089


RE: Request on part 6919
#16
(2020-10-12, 15:48)GeraldĀ Lasser Wrote: yes, sorry, I did not reply on this, the stdu2 is flush with the rim

There, I think that's a little more like it:
   

I had to deconstruct the stud2 primitive in order for it to mate with the 48 prims. That won't cause an issue, will it?


Attached Files
.dat   6919s02.dat (Size: 989 bytes / Downloads: 1)
.dat   6919s03.dat (Size: 7.17 KB / Downloads: 1)
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Request on part 6089 - by Mikkel Bech Jensen - 2013-11-16, 21:44
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 2:01
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-08, 7:30
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 13:20
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-08, 16:09
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 20:01
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-08, 20:21
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 20:40
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-12, 5:54
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-12, 11:36
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-12, 15:13
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-12, 15:48
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-12, 22:18
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-13, 14:35
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2021-06-13, 14:04
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2021-06-13, 15:05

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)