0 Name: entry - needless ?


Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ?
#9
Travis Cobbs Wrote:Official parts freely mix / and \ when specifying sub-parts on type 1 lines. That's not going to change

Yea, /that/ was what I encountered. Why won't that change? Is that considered a major revision of someone else's part?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Tim Gould - 2012-12-15, 23:57
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Chris Dee - 2012-12-18, 12:43
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Steffen - 2012-12-19, 1:49
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Paul Griffin - 2012-12-19, 8:09
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Steffen - 2012-12-19, 18:04

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)