Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file


Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file
#4
Travis Cobbs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>I like 0 !FILE_TYPE. I'm not completely opposed to Tore's 0 !LDRAW suggestion,
> but I think 0 !FILE_TYPE has the advantage of being focused,
> along with solving this specific problem.

Believe it not, I can live with 0 !FILE_TYPE(!) Even though I still like 0 !LDRAW better. Smile
Let's just hope it will not be confused with the MPD meta "0 FILE" by some more unofficial, home made MPD tool...
I think that's a greater risk than !LDRAW vs !LDRAW_ORG, that are more related to each other.

/Tore
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file - by Tore Eriksson - 2011-08-20, 19:09

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)