Ok, I was waiting to see what other were thinking of this but, seems we are all doing that 
I'm, ok with the above text, but personally I would have preferred keeping the Texture standard out the official one cause of the (sort of) proprietary nature of it.
Instead (like I noted somewhere before) I would have liked it to be a 'information only' support on LDraw.org. this would still (imho) make it possible to use it in the official library (using above mentioned additional formatting rules which we can mandate).
This because I don't see the benefits of adding a standard we can't change.
Don't get me wrong I'm ok with a standard which is managed outside the LSC, but I just don't see the need to make it look like it's managed by LDraw.org. Providing info alone would indicate it's supported by LDraw. You could see it as a third party managed plugin or something.
Just my thoughts.
I'm, ok with the above text, but personally I would have preferred keeping the Texture standard out the official one cause of the (sort of) proprietary nature of it.
Instead (like I noted somewhere before) I would have liked it to be a 'information only' support on LDraw.org. this would still (imho) make it possible to use it in the official library (using above mentioned additional formatting rules which we can mandate).
This because I don't see the benefits of adding a standard we can't change.
Don't get me wrong I'm ok with a standard which is managed outside the LSC, but I just don't see the need to make it look like it's managed by LDraw.org. Providing info alone would indicate it's supported by LDraw. You could see it as a third party managed plugin or something.
Just my thoughts.