Are standards for official parts too strict?

Hello There, Guest! Register

Are standards for official parts too strict?

Travis Cobbs Offline

Offline

LDraw.org Moderator

App Developers

James Jessiman Memorial

PTSubmit

Standards Board

Posts: 1,836
Threads: 83
Joined: Jul 2011

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict?

#22

2012-03-12, 5:39

Unless I'm reading something wrong, the use of {} for real names and [] for usernames is intended to make it obvious what's inside the brackets/braces.

Also, while the samples don't tabulate the HISTORY lines, I couldn't find anything in the header spec forbidding that. Do reviewers hold parts due to tabulated HISTORY lines? Did I miss the text somewhere that makes it illegal?

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-03-10, 9:07

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-03-10, 9:26

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tore Eriksson - 2012-03-10, 19:43

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Allen Smith - 2012-03-10, 21:52

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tore Eriksson - 2012-03-10, 23:12

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2012-03-11, 0:22

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-01-15, 19:06

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Travis Cobbs - 2013-01-16, 18:56

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2013-01-16, 19:40

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Allen Smith - 2013-01-16, 19:56

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2013-01-16, 19:59

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Orion Pobursky - 2013-01-16, 21:48

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Travis Cobbs - 2013-01-16, 22:03

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2013-01-17, 0:11

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Travis Cobbs - 2013-01-17, 2:53

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2013-01-17, 8:42

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Max Martin Richter - 2013-01-17, 8:06

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-01-17, 20:34

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Orion Pobursky - 2013-01-17, 21:25

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-01-18, 8:36

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-01-18, 16:50

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-01-18, 21:27

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Orion Pobursky - 2012-03-10, 22:32

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-03-10, 22:55

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tore Eriksson - 2012-03-10, 23:18

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Willy Tschager - 2012-03-10, 12:22

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-03-10, 19:43

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2012-03-11, 7:32

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2012-03-11, 13:49

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Orion Pobursky - 2012-03-11, 17:23

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-03-11, 18:17

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-03-12, 5:29

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2012-03-10, 13:05

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tore Eriksson - 2012-03-10, 20:30

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-03-10, 20:47

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2012-03-10, 19:13

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Jude Parrill - 2012-03-11, 8:51

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-03-12, 5:39

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Chris Dee - 2012-03-12, 6:01

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2012-03-12, 21:16

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Chris Dee - 2012-03-13, 22:33

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Allen Smith - 2012-03-20, 4:59

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Chris Dee - 2012-03-20, 16:57

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Allen Smith - 2012-03-21, 2:30

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-03-21, 2:55

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2012-03-21, 3:04

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2012-03-20, 19:21

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Greg Teft - 2012-04-11, 5:56

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-04-11, 6:10

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Greg Teft - 2012-06-21, 20:21

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Steffen - 2012-04-11, 23:19

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Tim Gould - 2012-04-12, 0:05

Re: Are standards for official parts too strict? - by Orion Pobursky - 2012-04-12, 0:28

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Current time: 2024-04-24, 19:20
Website copyright ©2003-2024 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details.
All user posts copyright © their respective posters
LDraw™ is a trademark owned and licensed by the Estate of James Jessiman

LDraw.org Forums are Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
LDraw.org Forum template derived from MyBB Master Template by MyBB Group
LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com.
LDraw is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.