(2022-11-12, 14:13)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: It cannot be replaced due to backward compatibility reasons, and because it is part of a number of heads, that admittedly also is obsoleted.
Hello,
From my point of view, it would be an improvement. The 3626bs01 and 3626cs01 versions also differ visually, I think 3626cs01 looks better (smoother).
If the dimensions are identical and the line types, I think 2 and 5, are also the same, there should be no difficulties here and could be replaced by the new version. Or where am I making a mistake?
Otherwise, a new version, for example 3626bs06, would have to be created. But then the question remains whether it makes sense. The saving would be one line of code.
Regards
Manfred