(2022-02-12, 11:23)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: And we already have numerous examples of printed parts without a "complete" part description, but instead describing only the pattern.
Like heads (3626, stud type), many tiles (stud type and/or groove/no groove) , r2 droid body parts (stud type and axlehole/no axlehole), and more.
This isn't a good reason to be contrary to the spec. There are quite a few part that deviate from the spec in one way or another as recycling them just to align them with a non-geometry spec change is dumb. However, all efforts should be made to ensure all new or revised part do conform.