Solved Parts 32561c01.dat and 32561c02.dat


RE: Parts 32561c01.dat and 32561c02.dat
#6
(2022-01-20, 23:54)Travis Cobbs Wrote: How did the files get a CA header if the author didn't affirm the CA?

Probably:

At Fri Nov 15 23:05:03 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen

It is standard procedure add that line to get rid off of all warnings. You simply don't care if the previous author has actually signed the CA 'cos all parts since 2007 have to be CA.

w.
LEGO ergo sum
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Parts 32561c01.dat and 32561c02.dat - by Willy Tschager - 2022-01-21, 7:09

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)