Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec
(2020-05-21, 19:20)Travis Cobbs Wrote: Just to be clear here, the intent (and what I called for votes on) is to add !DATA to the existing MPD spec, not create a new spec. Roland proposed (and I agreed) that it made more sense as an extension to MPD than as an independent thing. Since it is fundamentally tied to MPD, having it be separate would be bad.
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Travis Cobbs - 2020-05-21, 4:32
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Travis Cobbs - 2020-05-21, 4:33
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-05-21, 15:40
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Travis Cobbs - 2020-05-21, 19:20
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-05-21, 19:35
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-05-21, 20:07
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Travis Cobbs - 2020-05-21, 22:36
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Roland Melkert - 2020-05-22, 18:14
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Chris Dee - 2020-05-26, 5:38
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-05-26, 12:36
RE: Call for votes: Add !DATA to MPD spec - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-05-26, 20:17
|
