A question of priorities...

Re: A question of priorities...
Tore_Eriksson Wrote:
> We may be in minority, but you are not alone. IMO,
> primary focus should be on wether a part is
> correctly aligned, correct size and shape.
> Secondary, the part should have a name that the
> majority accepts and makes it easy to look up. But
> a reviewer's personal taste on maximum number of
> blank lines or what remarks should be allowed and
> how they are formatted is never an acceptable
> cause to hold a part in the Tracker.
> As long as the primary requirements are met (and
> not compromized!), a part can always be updated
> for better use of primitives or improved detail
> works. And the users have their official parts
> much quicker.

This discussion is as old as the library itself. The LSC has worked out specs to work around. Please read:


LEGO ergo sum
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Re: A question of priorities... - by Willy Tschager - 2011-08-05, 10:02

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)