Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?


Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?
#4
Totally agree that the library should have been completely converted to CCW from the beginning... All primitives were already converted this way some time ago. And indeed, boxes are of very limited benefit except to keep file size down (itself of limited benefit...)!
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2014-11-04, 14:03

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)