LDraw.org Discussion Forums › Models and Parts › Parts Authoring v
Standards for stud groups

Standards for stud groups


Orion Pobursky Offline
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTAdmin PTSubmit Standards Board Steering Committee
Posts: 4,462
Threads: 622
Joined: Jul 2011
Re: Standards for stud groups
#6
2011-11-15, 22:48
I have a few thoughts:
  • I'm not convinced the part size is really that big of a problem. I think it's a problem we invented as opposed to observed.
  • Stud logos. This has been argued before. I'm still of the position that logos are not part of the spec and therefore why should we care about them when certifying parts. If we really care that much about them to create extra "primitives" (i.e. 1 x X and X x 1) then we should codify it.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Standards for stud groups - by Tim Gould - 2011-11-15, 10:08
Re: Standards for stud groups - by Tim Gould - 2011-11-15, 22:17
Re: Standards for stud groups - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-11-15, 22:48
Re: Standards for stud groups - by Chris Dee - 2011-11-23, 20:53
why stugs exist / scaling - by Steffen - 2011-12-09, 23:17
Re: why stugs exist / scaling - by Steffen - 2011-12-09, 23:58

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)