Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives


Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives
#47
Santeri Piippo Wrote:I just use a parser class and read tokens based on a list of known keywords. With syntax like this, unknowns should get ignored anyway, otherwise it kind of defeats the point of the tag-value syntax.

Ah - the implication here is that a FUTURE tag strings (not yet known to us now) must never occur as a value string. This is a little bit unnerving since some of the tags (e.g. human readable name, folder name) could be anything.

So...this isn't my favorite proposal for that reason, but it can be made it work, if similarity to existing tech is highly desirable.

Cheers
Ben
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives - by Ben Supnik - 2013-08-21, 18:49

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 23 Guest(s)