Any model using torus files with such names would not display correctly in LDView with primitive substitution enabled, because primitive substitution there parses the filename and has expectations based on the spec. In other words, the spec says that the first two numbers after the t represent the denominator of a 1/x expression, and LDView behaves accordingly.
Why are there no "odd" torus primitives?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
Why are there no "odd" torus primitives? - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-07-30, 18:18
Re: Why are there no "odd" torus primitives? - by Chris Dee - 2013-07-30, 18:44
Re: Why are there no "odd" torus primitives? - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-07-31, 8:07
Re: Why are there no "odd" torus primitives? - by Bernd Broich - 2013-08-10, 20:17
Re: Why are there no "odd" torus primitives? - by Travis Cobbs - 2013-08-12, 4:45
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)