Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst

Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst

Chris Dee Offline

LDraw.org Moderator

Posts: 1,106
Threads: 77
Joined: Jul 2011

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst

#32

2013-08-04, 6:45

Has it really been over a year since we last discussed this?

Does anyone have a problem with using "=" as the description prefix for alias parts? I think it is a good compromise.

Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-02-18, 21:49

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Tim Gould - 2012-02-18, 23:44

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Jude Parrill - 2012-02-19, 0:45

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-02-19, 15:37

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Willy Tschager - 2012-02-19, 17:04

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Philippe Hurbain - 2012-02-19, 17:58

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-02-19, 18:08

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Tim Gould - 2012-02-19, 20:19

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Philippe Hurbain - 2012-02-20, 8:13

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2012-02-21, 23:51

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-02-22, 6:37

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2012-02-22, 21:39

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-02-23, 6:28

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2012-02-23, 8:14

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-02-23, 9:30

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2012-05-04, 16:03

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-08-04, 6:45

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Tim Gould - 2013-08-04, 7:26

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Willy Tschager - 2013-08-04, 16:30

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-08-04, 16:44

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Willy Tschager - 2013-08-04, 17:56

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Allen Smith - 2013-08-05, 18:44

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Tim Gould - 2013-08-05, 20:51

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-08-05, 21:11

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-08-09, 5:35

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-08-09, 7:09

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Rolf Osterthun - 2013-08-09, 10:08

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-08-09, 10:37

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-08-09, 15:51

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Tim Gould - 2013-08-09, 13:41

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-08-09, 14:10

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2013-09-01, 20:28

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-09-01, 20:39

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2013-09-01, 21:09

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-09-02, 6:54

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2013-09-03, 18:02

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-10-06, 19:31

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-10-06, 19:36

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-10-06, 19:42

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2013-10-06, 21:09

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-08-04, 15:03

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Allen Smith - 2012-04-09, 0:47

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-04-17, 14:36

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Allen Smith - 2012-04-17, 16:07

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-04-17, 16:16

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-05-10, 10:13

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Roland Melkert - 2012-05-10, 16:54

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-05-10, 20:51

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Roland Melkert - 2012-05-10, 21:47

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Tim Gould - 2012-05-10, 21:04

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Magnus Forsberg - 2012-02-23, 21:50

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-02-24, 6:17

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Steffen - 2012-02-24, 9:36

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Willy Tschager - 2012-04-04, 11:47

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Chris Dee - 2012-04-04, 12:34

Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Willy Tschager - 2012-04-06, 6:22

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 21 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me