Allen Smith Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I agree with Travis that this is an unusual
> requirement. I suppose mainly it highlights the
> use of an inlined part in case the number changes
> while on the part tracker?
I wasn't objecting to having the unofficial part get a new name in the MPD, but to the way that it appears in the MPD after that. I meant for "<Filename>" to represent the modified name. There was a discussion on why the parts have to be renamed, and I'm OK with the results of that discussion.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I agree with Travis that this is an unusual
> requirement. I suppose mainly it highlights the
> use of an inlined part in case the number changes
> while on the part tracker?
I wasn't objecting to having the unofficial part get a new name in the MPD, but to the way that it appears in the MPD after that. I meant for "<Filename>" to represent the modified name. There was a discussion on why the parts have to be renamed, and I'm OK with the results of that discussion.