3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices

3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices

Roland Melkert Offline

LDraw.org Moderator

Posts: 3,046
Threads: 162
Joined: Jul 2011

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices

2013-03-24, 21:24

Side note:

Would it be save to re normalize the 3x3rotation part of type 1 lines (if abs(d)==1) just after loading, it would in theory automatically scale all fractions up.

Or i'm i missing something?

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Ben Supnik - 2013-03-23, 19:48

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Roland Melkert - 2013-03-23, 21:27

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-03-23, 23:02

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Tim Gould - 2013-03-23, 23:14

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Ben Supnik - 2013-03-24, 2:29

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Tim Gould - 2013-03-24, 7:06

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Ben Supnik - 2013-03-24, 15:46

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Tim Gould - 2013-03-24, 21:13

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Roland Melkert - 2013-03-24, 21:24

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Tim Gould - 2013-03-24, 21:33

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Ben Supnik - 2013-03-25, 2:44

Re: 3 decimals is not a lot of precision for rotation matrices - by Sergio Reano - 2013-03-26, 22:29

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me