Parts on hold on PT


Re: Proposal Re: Parts on hold on PT
#16
But we do not have a version control system in our library. So we need to do all by hand.
As an author of a part normally I like to finish the whole part. At some stage I think it is ok to upload to the pt. Then the first reviewer find a mistake and vote hold/nocertify. The author should have the possibility to change the part himself. So one month will be fine for me. Most (if not all) do have a job and a family. They need to do one step after the other and they can not immediately after any vote respond or update the part. If I did not stated the file to be free for all to update I would be disappointed if someone else put his hands on my code. I think that also some other author feel like that. And because we do this hobby all in our free time (we can do a lot of other things) we should keep the part authors happy.

Just my 5 dollar Smile
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Parts on hold on PT - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-03-10, 10:06
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-03-10, 10:44
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Chris Dee - 2013-03-10, 14:56
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Steffen - 2013-04-14, 12:40
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-03-10, 16:04
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-03-10, 16:30
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Tim Gould - 2013-03-10, 23:03
Re: Proposal Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-03-13, 22:52
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Stan Isachenko - 2013-03-10, 20:38

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)