Parts on hold on PT


Re: Proposal Re: Parts on hold on PT
#14
I feel any policy change to reduce the embargo time would be most beneficial.

Personally, I think the ideal hold time is zero. After all, this is how software development usually works. Most version control systems accept changes at any time. If someone else commits a change to a file you are working on, the version control system automatically merges in the other person's changes before you commit.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Parts on hold on PT - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-03-10, 10:06
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-03-10, 10:44
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Chris Dee - 2013-03-10, 14:56
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Steffen - 2013-04-14, 12:40
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-03-10, 16:04
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-03-10, 16:30
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Tim Gould - 2013-03-10, 23:03
Re: Proposal Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Allen Smith - 2013-03-13, 22:41
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Stan Isachenko - 2013-03-10, 20:38

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)