Parts on hold on PT


Re: Parts on hold on PT
#8
I like your point of view Smile

But...
please keep in mind that everybody that is working on this does this in his free time (beneth work and family).

I think that the current rules give us enough room to improve files also if the author has left his files alone (i also have done that for several parts, that i came across now Smile )
The reason for that can be a wide range of reasons therefore I do not mention that many reasons now.

It is always a good practise to respond to submit or hold or novote within a short time. But not in any case possible. If there are only two guys in summary that do this job, the files should get out quickly.

But there are for several reasons hold files that needs more than just a hold or novote. These files needs to be discussed. And sometimes nobody really cares about that files and so they sit on the PT for years.

This is my second approach to minimize the hold files. If you have a look at the history bar you will see my first attempt Smile

From time to time the old things needs a deeper look, like in reality Smile
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Parts on hold on PT - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-03-10, 10:06
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-03-10, 10:44
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Chris Dee - 2013-03-10, 14:56
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Steffen - 2013-04-14, 12:40
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-03-10, 16:04
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-03-10, 16:30
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-03-10, 20:17
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Tim Gould - 2013-03-10, 23:03
Re: Parts on hold on PT - by Stan Isachenko - 2013-03-10, 20:38

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)