Problems with 4218a and 4219a


Re: Problems with 4218a and 4219a
#5
I would suggest a correction of this part with the number without identifier "a" (And Bricklink says, that that our 4218 is 4219 and our 4219 is 4218, doesn't it?
The old files should get a ~ in front of the description.

/Max
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Problems with 4218a and 4219a - by Max Martin Richter - 2013-02-21, 21:41

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)