[Thoughts wanted] Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst


Re: [Thoughts wanted] V3 - Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst
#43
Even if it can't do it now, by standardising we offer the option for the future Smile With needlessly different formats it is much harder.

Some points:
* It's trivial but "L_D_raw-Library" would be better as that is the correct capitalisation of the 'brand'.
* What does NameEntry contain? Just "3005.dat" I guess
* What is the format of FileDate?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: [Thoughts wanted] V3 - Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-07, 21:53

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)