[Thoughts wanted] Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst


Re: [Thoughts wanted] V3 - Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst
#41
Roland Melkert Wrote:Why not separate? Isn't the whole point of this xml file so 3rd party software doesn't need to parse/disect stuff?

My 2cts:

Yes. And I will.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: [Thoughts wanted] V3 - Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-07, 21:12

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)