[Thoughts wanted] Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst


Re: [Thoughts wanted] UPDATE: Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst
#37
Tim Gould Wrote:No. Because reading .dat files is a pain in the ass. This is the main reason I chose XML file format, and I presume it's the same for Mike and Allen.

You could say the same about xml files (them being a pain), because any serious LDraw application needs to parse dat/ldr/mpd files at some point so a using it's core library reading the header stuff should also take only a handful of lines.

I'm just saying, not taking anybody's side or something.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: [Thoughts wanted] UPDATE: Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst - by Roland Melkert - 2013-02-07, 18:24

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)