Yes, exactly. The current written text about the 0 Name: tag is on one hand not enough to understand and on the other hand wrong!
So a clarification is highly wished by me.
So a clarification is highly wished by me.
0 Name: entry - needless ?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Michael Heidemann - 2012-12-15, 10:43
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Tim Gould - 2012-12-15, 23:57
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Michael Heidemann - 2012-12-16, 16:48
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Chris Dee - 2012-12-18, 12:43
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Michael Heidemann - 2012-12-18, 17:01
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Paul Griffin - 2012-12-17, 2:25
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Steffen - 2012-12-19, 1:49
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-12-19, 5:13
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Paul Griffin - 2012-12-19, 8:09
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-12-19, 17:28
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Steffen - 2012-12-19, 18:04
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)