Request for new primitives


RE: Request for new primitives
#22
(2026-03-28, 9:40)Peter Blomberg Wrote: I'm surprised. We had lots of discussion about the x+ decimals last year, yet nobody pointed out such a limit. The specs didn't explicitly state it at the time. We came to the conclusion that 8 and 10 decimals were too many and could be the reason for a hold vote. At the time, 6 decimals outside a rotation matrix was not a reason for a hold vote.

   

6 digits were always a "bad figure". Above a "Wayback" from 2 years ago.

w.
LEGO ergo sum
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Request for new primitives - by Willy Tschager - 2026-03-28, 15:53

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)