This is that way I see it.
I support this method as it is clearly backwards compatible and is easy to review within the current LDraw standards.
However, library support will not be implemented until and unless LDView, LDCad, Buildinginstructions.js, and LeoCad support.
Additionally, I do not support allowing the "layering" of LDraw geometry via an additional !META command.
I support this method as it is clearly backwards compatible and is easy to review within the current LDraw standards.
However, library support will not be implemented until and unless LDView, LDCad, Buildinginstructions.js, and LeoCad support.
Additionally, I do not support allowing the "layering" of LDraw geometry via an additional !META command.