Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification


RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification
#30
(2026-02-10, 22:25)Roland Melkert Wrote: I would suggest to only allow this inside a "LDraw Texture" subfile.

This reminds me to ask, how would the LDraw texture code be provided?
  • As a normal subfile using 0 FILE or normal search paths?
  • As a special kind of subfile, also using 0 FILE or search paths, but with modified headers/syntax?
  • As a code snippet using the proposed !CODE meta (or search paths)?
  • Within the TEXMAP statement?
  • All of the above?

I had envisioned either !CODE snippets or geometry within the TEXMAP statement, but perhaps other options should be left open, if further extensions to LDraw texture capabilities are to be explored.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Discussion - proposal to extend !TEXMAP specification - by N. W. Perry - 2026-02-11, 5:50

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)