(2025-11-23, 9:35)Rene Rechthaler Wrote: then why do we have 7 parts: 700a/b and u8010 and its variants b/c/d/e?This issue isn't limited to Mursten. Some contributors happily create part variants with even the smallest of differences. Sometimes visual accuracy may take precedence over part functionality. As a community-driven project, this is just something we need to live with. However, LDraw could benefit from an ontology that clearly distinguishes base parts and part variants.
(as stated above, I think there may be some doubles)
Does anyone have the ones with 2 crosses and the one with the rounded/square supports?
because of the bottom stud row of some, there are differences in connecting.
Mursten
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Mursten - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-21, 19:59
RE: Mursten - by Magnus Forsberg - 2025-11-21, 21:52
RE: Mursten - by N. W. Perry - 2025-11-22, 16:18
RE: Mursten - by Rene Rechthaler - 2025-11-22, 16:45
RE: Mursten - by N. W. Perry - 2025-11-22, 16:57
RE: Mursten - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-22, 22:39
RE: Mursten - by Chris Böhnke - 2025-11-23, 0:00
RE: Mursten - by N. W. Perry - 2025-11-23, 5:43
RE: Mursten - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-23, 9:22
RE: Mursten - by Chris Böhnke - 2025-11-23, 10:56
RE: Mursten - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-23, 11:09
RE: Mursten - by Rene Rechthaler - 2025-11-23, 8:26
RE: Mursten - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-23, 9:25
RE: Mursten - by Rene Rechthaler - 2025-11-23, 9:35
RE: Mursten - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-11-23, 11:23
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)