I get your concern. Two things:
- While I've tried to make it easier, part review has always involved some amount of research. Also, every pattern and sticker requires a set keyword. This is enforced by the submit process. If the external site keywords are missing, you can use the set number.
- We should be primarily concerned with visual correctness. Meta data and color is fixable without an obsolete and (except in rare cases) origin/geometry are not.
I think we're starting getting too far out in the weeds with some of our reviews. Some of that may be that by working closer with RB, I've made it significantly easier to find the source material. I'm not going to take away functionality but I will remind reviewers of the real goal now and again which is user experience.
- While I've tried to make it easier, part review has always involved some amount of research. Also, every pattern and sticker requires a set keyword. This is enforced by the submit process. If the external site keywords are missing, you can use the set number.
- We should be primarily concerned with visual correctness. Meta data and color is fixable without an obsolete and (except in rare cases) origin/geometry are not.
I think we're starting getting too far out in the weeds with some of our reviews. Some of that may be that by working closer with RB, I've made it significantly easier to find the source material. I'm not going to take away functionality but I will remind reviewers of the real goal now and again which is user experience.