(Yesterday, 22:58)Orion Pobursky Wrote: If there are any errors in the header that aren't caught by the submit process then only a comment is needed. I read every comment before I certify and fixing header errors is trivial.
In terms of correcting the keywords, I fully understand your viewpoint. However, I'm concerned that the review process itself is more laborious if the external link keywords are wrong or missing since it makes finding images that much harder. From what I have so far elucidated, Rebrickable and BrickLink are also the main sources for verifying the colors on a pattern.
In the absence of images, I could only review the actual code lines in the file. Thus resulting in a partial review. Can I then use a phrase such as "Visual comparison and colors haven't been checked" when submitting a certify vote? Or should I only make a comment such as "The code appears ok"?