(2025-09-23, 22:55)Orion Pobursky Wrote: I don't entirely disagree with you. There some common practices/judgement calls that aren't in the specs and the hold list has it's purpose. What I don't want it to be is a mirror of the specs themselves.
Understood.
As a part-time reviewer, I find it elusive to learn all the exceptions and judgement calls. I make so many mistakes. Sometimes I feel that I just stir up trouble. It would be so much easier if there was something of a reviewer's reference where one could quickly lookup established practices.
As for the quality of geometry implementation, there are no established "good practices". This leaves a lot grey area between 'good quality' and 'violation of the specs'.