I don't entirely disagree with you. There some common practices/judgement calls that aren't in the specs and the hold list has it's purpose. What I don't want it to be is a mirror of the specs themselves.
That said, I'm (mostly) with Philo in that for geometry related questions, if there is no visual error it should not trigger a hold. We're starting, in some instances, to cross the line into pedantry in this regard. If you feel you're part has been held inappropriately, appeal to the Admins and we will make a binding decision.
I will depart from Philo in that I think there should be a rigidly defined header and meta data structure.
That said, I'm (mostly) with Philo in that for geometry related questions, if there is no visual error it should not trigger a hold. We're starting, in some instances, to cross the line into pedantry in this regard. If you feel you're part has been held inappropriately, appeal to the Admins and we will make a binding decision.
I will depart from Philo in that I think there should be a rigidly defined header and meta data structure.