(2025-09-12, 14:13)Gerald Lasser Wrote: The colour 16 one is from the BI and, according to OP, in system, I didn't check thisThe geometry of 30022 might still be 1 LDU off from being the most "in system" (71 instead of 72 LDU tall, as I first suggested). With actual bricks there's still a very small ridge left over with the construction below. That would also correspond with the 1.72 distance shown with the raw mesh (69.28...+ 1.72 = 71.00... ). The front/back/top for the older 3145 seems to be in-system for a triangular grid, but not a rectangular one.
Fix for slightly incorrect geometry of 30022
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
Fix for slightly incorrect geometry of 30022 - by Huib Versteeg - 2025-09-11, 20:03
RE: Fix for slightly incorrect geometry of 30022 - by Gerald Lasser - 2025-09-11, 21:13
RE: Fix for slightly incorrect geometry of 30022 - by Chris Böhnke - 2025-09-11, 23:47
RE: Fix for slightly incorrect geometry of 30022 - by Gerald Lasser - 2025-09-12, 14:13
RE: Fix for slightly incorrect geometry of 30022 - by Huib Versteeg - Yesterday, 9:50
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)