@Magnus
I'm not saying that be need to change this practice (since we're already doing it), but this is not what the spec implies:
So let's make the spec match what we want to avoid confusion.
I'm not saying that be need to change this practice (since we're already doing it), but this is not what the spec implies:
Quote:Occasionally a part is included with geometry that is not quite correct or the part number itself is incorrect. In this instance, in order to preserve backward compatibility, when a corrected part is made, it's part number will follow these rules and the non-alpha suffix part will be made obsolete.
So let's make the spec match what we want to avoid confusion.