While I'm not gonna stop usage, I'm with Willy. I don't really see the point. Given the grief they cause the line savings argument doesn't really hold water (not that I feel the line saving argument is really valid in the first place). The only benefit in my mind is that the quad is guaranteed to never be non-coplanar but I don't think this outweighs the cons.
Rect decimal precision
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Rect decimal precision - by Magnus Forsberg - 2025-04-02, 21:05
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-04-03, 5:56
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Philippe Hurbain - 2025-04-03, 12:20
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Willy Tschager - 2025-04-03, 16:25
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-04-03, 23:26
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Nils Schmidt - 2025-04-04, 17:19
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Gerald Lasser - 2025-04-04, 18:44
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Rene Rechthaler - 2025-04-03, 15:38
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Philippe Hurbain - 2025-04-03, 16:26
RE: Rect decimal precision - by Orion Pobursky - 2025-04-04, 0:42
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)