Poll: Do you want all mould variants of a part in your digital parts library?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
25.00%
1 25.00%
No
50.00%
2 50.00%
I don't care
25.00%
1 25.00%
Total 4 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Are underside reinforcements relevant?


RE: Are underside reinforcements relevant?
#4
I envision underside details like this to be part of a system of aesthetic enhancements that can be applied client-side, just as primitive substitution is currently. I would imagine it being settable on a per-part basis, so that you could apply underside detail only to those elements that are exposed in your build, for example, or if you want to choose a certain historical variant of a printed brick.

So you would not have to model endless versions of library parts, but rather code the information as some kind of metadata or perhaps a shadow library. Only the base version would need to appear in the library.

This is one of those things that I envision as part of LDraw 2.0 (which, to be clear, has yet to exist). Wink
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Are underside reinforcements relevant? - by N. W. Perry - 10 hours ago

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)