Interesting. I'd go with 0 !FILE_TYPE. This may clear up a few issue but, as we saw with ldconfig.ldr, a new meta depends on support for the program authors.
Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file - by Roland Melkert - 2011-08-18, 17:52
Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-08-19, 8:11
Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file - by Roland Melkert - 2011-08-19, 18:51
Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-08-20, 7:17
Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file - by Travis Cobbs - 2011-08-20, 17:51
Re: Generic (non library related) way of indicating the nature of a LDraw file - by Allen Smith - 2011-09-24, 21:33
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)