LDCad Make 572c01 flexible


RE: Make 572c01 flexible
#11
(2024-06-23, 19:46)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Go ahead and do whatever makes sense.

To me it make sense to replace the code of 572b with the shorter string segment found in 572e. 
That one is better suited and made for easy use in LSynth.

   

Or do I need to make 572b obsolete, and then place the content of 572e in my new flex_section file?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Roland Melkert - 2024-06-26, 19:53
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by N. W. Perry - 2020-06-11, 14:12
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by N. W. Perry - 2020-06-11, 17:57
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-23, 15:41
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Orion Pobursky - 2024-06-23, 19:46
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-24, 19:54
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-25, 19:41
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-26, 21:14
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Orion Pobursky - 2024-06-25, 20:07

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)