LDCad Make 572c01 flexible


RE: Make 572c01 flexible
#9
I want to renumber these parts.

   

572d and 572e have recently been deemed obsolete and are now deleted.

Should the base parts have the -f1 suffix, or not?
Can I go ahead, or do anyone see a problem with this?
The LDCad template need to be updated too.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Roland Melkert - 2024-06-26, 19:53
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by N. W. Perry - 2020-06-11, 14:12
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by N. W. Perry - 2020-06-11, 17:57
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-23, 15:41
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Orion Pobursky - 2024-06-23, 19:46
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-24, 19:54
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-25, 19:41
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Magnus Forsberg - 2024-06-26, 21:14
RE: Make 572c01 flexible - by Orion Pobursky - 2024-06-25, 20:07

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)