Hi Eric,
Personally I wouldn't support such a list in any official capacity, although if you wanted to share what you've done on the wiki I wouldn't argue.
Unofficial part numbers should not be considered fixed until they appear in a library. And they should be included as a sub-model. Of course we don't all do this (I certainly don't) but it is 'best practise' and should be encouraged. I definitely think it's a case of caveat emptor if you choose not to do this.
Tim
Personally I wouldn't support such a list in any official capacity, although if you wanted to share what you've done on the wiki I wouldn't argue.
Unofficial part numbers should not be considered fixed until they appear in a library. And they should be included as a sub-model. Of course we don't all do this (I certainly don't) but it is 'best practise' and should be encouraged. I definitely think it's a case of caveat emptor if you choose not to do this.
Tim