RE: Parts with flexible sub-Parts
2023-12-17, 16:04 (This post was last modified: 2023-12-17, 21:43 by Magnus Forsberg.)
2023-12-17, 16:04 (This post was last modified: 2023-12-17, 21:43 by Magnus Forsberg.)
Question for Philo or Roland
How should these "parts" be changed to be useful both as LSynth parts, and a flexible template in LDCad?
572a and 572c are simple, just renumber, as they are not resizable sections.
But how should the string be made?
I think it should be a short section, not resizable, since there is a "pattern" on the string.
Used repeatedly, to create the long bendable string. 572e might be too long?
IMO, 572b and 572d could be made obsolete.
572c01 is using 572a, 572b and 572c
572c02 is using 572a and many 572b
But none of these are useful as "templetes" since the "572b-section" should be bendable.
How should these "parts" be changed to be useful both as LSynth parts, and a flexible template in LDCad?
572a and 572c are simple, just renumber, as they are not resizable sections.
But how should the string be made?
I think it should be a short section, not resizable, since there is a "pattern" on the string.
Used repeatedly, to create the long bendable string. 572e might be too long?
IMO, 572b and 572d could be made obsolete.
572c01 is using 572a, 572b and 572c
572c02 is using 572a and many 572b
But none of these are useful as "templetes" since the "572b-section" should be bendable.