3023a?


RE: 3023a?
#8
(2023-07-08, 7:36)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: Could you please tell us why a single renumbering has such a big impact?

There are lots of parts which are basically a 1x2 plate/tile with some attachment, but they aren't using a common subpart.

So I used the SNAP_INCL meta to add 3023.dat's anti studs to them, but the meta is non recursive so the moved to nullified the inclusion.

Similar changes won't go unnoticed in the future as I added a check for it to the new shadow validation tool.

I'm also considering depreciating SNAP_INCL as it causes potential maintenance problems while you just as easily could've add native antistuds.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
3023a? - by Steve - 2023-07-04, 21:19
RE: 3023a? - by Orion Pobursky - 2023-07-04, 21:39
RE: 3023a? - by Steve - 2023-07-06, 0:37
RE: 3023a? - by Rene Rechthaler - 2023-07-06, 16:01
RE: 3023a? - by Orion Pobursky - 2023-07-06, 16:58
RE: 3023a? - by Roland Melkert - 2023-07-07, 22:10
RE: 3023a? - by Magnus Forsberg - 2023-07-08, 7:36
RE: 3023a? - by Roland Melkert - 2023-07-08, 18:14
RE: 3023a? - by Jaco van der Molen - 2023-07-11, 11:46
RE: 3023a? - by Jaco van der Molen - 2024-09-06, 6:01
RE: 3023a? - by Jaco van der Molen - 2024-09-06, 6:22
RE: 3023a? - by Steve - 2023-07-30, 22:54
RE: 3023a? - by Steve - 2023-07-31, 23:04
RE: 3023a? - by Roland Melkert - 2023-07-31, 23:41
RE: 3023a? - by Nathan S - 2024-09-06, 0:35

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)