(2023-06-24, 3:04)Orion Pobursky Wrote: This update also includes 2276 parts that have been updated to CC BY 4.0 . These files are included with only the license line updated (as opposed to the the normal process of updating the !LDRAW_ORG line and adding a !HISTORY statement)
Thank you for this update! I can confirm that there was a massive improvement over the last release concerning the number of parts that are now released under CC-BY-4.0. Here is the situation as it was with the 2302 release. I sorted parts by popularity according to the rebrickable database of LEGO sets.
- of the top 100 parts, 41 were not CC-BY-4.0, namely 3710, 54200, 3666, 2412b, 3623, 3622, 2420, 43093, 32062, 3437, 3460, 6636, 85984, 3713, 11477, 3034, 2357, 3700, 4519, 15068, 59900, 87580, 4162, 87087, 3008, 2877, 6091, 32054, 4477, 44728, 6536, 3705, 3749, 3011, 6541, 2540, 60897, 3832, 3037, 48336, 3701
- after removing all parts and primitives that were not CC-BY-4.0, out of 23955 parts, only 4402 remain (18.38%)
- after that removal, out of the top 100 parts, 98 were missing
The situation now with the 2303 release is this:
- of the top 100 parts, 7 are not CC-BY-4.0, namely 3437, 87580, 87087, 32054, 44728, 3011, 48336
- after removing all parts and primitives that were not CC-BY-4.0, out of 24488 parts, 9086 remain (37.10%)
- after that removal, out of the top 100 parts, 38 are missing, namely: 3005, 2780, 98138, 3622, 4274, 3437, 6636, 3039, 3713, 4032a, 3660, 11477, 3665, 3700, 3941, 61332, 15068, 59900, 87580, 87087, 3008, 30136, 3673, 6091, 32028, 32054, 2654, 44728, 6536, 15712, 99780, 59443, 99207, 3011, 2540, 48336, 3701, 50950
Here is a list of top removal reasons sorted by how many parts are directly or indirectly blocked by it:
Code:
p/4-4cylc.dat 3275
p/1-4chrd.dat 2830
p/1-8chrd.dat 2234
p/box2-7.dat 1621
p/48/1-4edge.dat 1267
p/48/1-4cyli.dat 1063
p/box4-4a.dat 990
p/2-4cylc.dat 963
p/box3u5p.dat 703
p/3-16ndis.dat 661
p/7-16cyli.dat 634
p/box5-4a.dat 594Maybe this table can help identify which bits can be looked at next to improve the situation for the following release. Thanks!
Also during my analysis I noticed that parts/54696p02c01.dat contains a reference to the non-existing 54696p02.dat. Maybe an oversight?