The consistency knife cuts both ways. "pXX" part are primarily patterns. I want all patterns to be easily found if a MOCer wants to use them. There needs to be consistent, enforceable standards in naming and keywords to eliminate confusion and in a way that can be checked automatically. Since there was significant push back on using Bricklink or Rebrickable numbers, set numbers were a compromise. Could I force through such a policy? Yes, but I don't really want to. Do I wish we had done dual moulds a different way, like "mXX"? Yes. Is it too late switch? Probably.
New shortcut to submit 12622p02
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
New shortcut to submit 12622p02 - by Vincent Messenet - 2023-05-07, 16:10
RE: New shortcut to submit 12622p02 - by Orion Pobursky - 2023-05-07, 17:08
RE: New shortcut to submit 12622p02 - by Philippe Hurbain - 2023-05-07, 18:38
RE: New shortcut to submit 12622p02 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2023-05-07, 21:00
RE: New shortcut to submit 12622p02 - by Orion Pobursky - 2023-05-07, 23:24
RE: New shortcut to submit 12622p02 - by Vincent Messenet - 2023-05-10, 5:42
RE: New shortcut to submit 12622p02 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2023-05-10, 15:21
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)