(2023-05-07, 17:08)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Here's the relevant comment from Magnus:
This part is in a grey area. I think for simplicity's sake that we should probably call this a shortcut and move the part but I'd appreciate input from Magnus and others on this thought.
This is the same old question again. When should we use -pXX or the -cXX suffix?
I tried to argue that a "pattern" could be created by assembling "parts" of different colours. But now I don't know anymore.
To me, the rule that force a p-suffix part to have "Pattern" in the description and a set number as keyword, is to strict. We have many examples of shortcuts where either p-suffix or c-suffix is used. Many of the Hip and legs shortcuts use p-suffix but are assemblies of differently coloured parts, not printed.
And some examples of the opposite is also made, all the pirate hip and legs shortcuts use c-suffix. Now there are some pirate shortcuts that have a printed hip and leg. How should they be numbered? I want to use the p-suffix.
To me, this car base assembly is acceptable with a p-suffix, without the word Pattern. Consistency is more important here. We have choosen the p-suffix on the first part, and then we should follow that path. I don't want to have a renumbering bonanza.