Last update was the initial roll out of 4.0 so, yes, as of now all parts are dual licensed. 2023-02 (currently targeted for 4/15-4/16) will see the next phase with 4.0 only parts for those parts where all documented authors have agreed to the new license. Note that my statement above about the library never going completely 4.0 still applies.
Solved license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Johannes Schauer - 2022-09-25, 10:03
RE: license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Orion Pobursky - 2022-09-25, 16:25
RE: license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Johannes Schauer - 2023-04-12, 11:23
RE: license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Orion Pobursky - 2023-04-12, 13:30
RE: license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Max Murtazin - 2023-04-12, 13:34
RE: license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Orion Pobursky - 2023-04-12, 13:48
RE: license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Johannes Schauer - 2023-04-12, 15:15
RE: license of files in the 2205 release -- CC BY 4.0 not mentioned anywhere? - by Orion Pobursky - 2023-04-12, 16:47
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)