RE: Question about the pattern of the parts
2023-03-09, 17:48 (This post was last modified: 2023-03-09, 17:49 by Manfred Schaefer.)
2023-03-09, 17:48 (This post was last modified: 2023-03-09, 17:49 by Manfred Schaefer.)
A theoretical solution for my described case would be.
3626cp84 would have to be renamed (~Moveto ...). Then 3626cp7g could be renamed to 3626cp84.
But this is probably not possible, because 3626cp84 was already used and if it was replaced by 3626cp7g, the model files that used this part would have to be adjusted.
Conceivable would be a script, which contains this information and is delivered with each update of the library. This script would make an adjustment depending on the file date of the model. Probably too complex.
Or a designation would have to be selected for the pattern, which was not used yet in one of the three variants. Here, unfortunately, some designations would be lost.
Is there ever a lock on the parts tracker?
Greetings
Manfred
3626cp84 would have to be renamed (~Moveto ...). Then 3626cp7g could be renamed to 3626cp84.
But this is probably not possible, because 3626cp84 was already used and if it was replaced by 3626cp7g, the model files that used this part would have to be adjusted.
Conceivable would be a script, which contains this information and is delivered with each update of the library. This script would make an adjustment depending on the file date of the model. Probably too complex.
Or a designation would have to be selected for the pattern, which was not used yet in one of the three variants. Here, unfortunately, some designations would be lost.
Is there ever a lock on the parts tracker?
Greetings
Manfred