n-fcyls2 / n-fcyls Primitives


RE: n-fcyls2 / n-fcyls Primitives
#14
(2022-02-03, 8:16)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Clearly yes, I mixed up things with the prefix! tcyls and tcyls2 suit me.
I already have a part on PT that would benefit of a 1-8tcyls2 
So I think, but the new prims were already on PT. If we all agree it's not too late to change that!

I agree, the tndis is a better acronym
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: n-fcyls2 / n-fcyls Primitives - by Gerald Lasser - 2022-02-03, 20:12

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)